Official responses to the Nigeria elections 2007

Official responses to the Nigeria elections 2007 Print E-mail

In strongly worded statements, delegations from the European Union, the Economic Community of West African States and the United States' National Democratic Institute said the elections were not credible.

 

In Washington the U.S. State Department said it was "deeply troubled" by reports of violence and vote rigging.

 

 These are some of the official response to the Nigeria elections 2007:  

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC): “a free and fair contest”
After the presidential vote, Nigeria's Election Chairman Maurice Iwu said the INEC deserved to give itself a huge pat on the back, and that the elections were a success.  He affirmed that Yar’adua of the PDP won the presidential election in a free and fair contest.

Iwu said he gave the election a "pass mark". He acknowledged there had been some "irregularities", but said the election was "80 per cent successful".  Both Mr Obasanjo and Maurice Iwu, the chairman of the electoral commission, continued to defend the overall process, while other senior political figures warned about the dangers of wholesale condemnation.

http://www.inecnigeria.org/newsview.php?newsid=319 

President-elect Umar Musa Yar’Adua: “best election country has ever had”
In response to strongly worded statements from the European Union, the Economic Community of West African States and the United States' National Democratic Institute that the elections were not credible, President-elect Umar Musa Yar'Adua said: "I believe that is an opinion that is not based on fact. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Some others believe that this is the best election the country has ever had. These statements need to be seen in the context of Nigeria's past elections.” 

Transition Monitoring Group (TMG), on behalf of the Domestic Election Observation Group: “elections were a charade”
The TMG, with 50,000 Nigeria observers on the ground, called for the polls to be cancelled, and said that the irregularities were so numerous and so far-reaching that "the election was a charade and did not meet the standards required for democratic elections".

“Our monitors throughout the country … documented numerous lapses, massive irregularities and electoral malpractices that characterized the elections in many states.  We therefore reject the elections and call for their cancellation. The Federal Government and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) have failed woefully in their responsibility to conduct free, fair and credible elections.

“We do not believe that any outcome of the elections can represent the will of the people. A democratic arrangement founded on such fraud can have no legitimacy.” "We call on the international community not to recognise these discredited elections and not to confer legitimacy on any government that emerges therefrom", said the TMG head, Innocent Chukwuma.

Read the full report 

Joint Action Forum: “Inec siding with the PDP”
The local Nigerian Joint Action Forum, comprising 50 civil society organisations, wants a re-run of the elections. "An appraisal of the electoral process reveals an Inec that is not only partisan in siding with the ruling PDP but is generally unprepared for the elections.”

"Worst of all is the presidential poll held yesterday that is marred by voters' apathy as a result of Inec failings to hold as scheduled the Presidential and National Assembly elections in some parts of the country."

http://www.iri.org/newsarchive/2007/2007-04-23-News-BBCNews-Nigeria.asp Economic

Community of West African States (Ecowas): “validity of the elections challenged”
An Ecowas observer described the polls as "fairly acceptable" rather than "free and fair".

But at a news conference held at the ECOWAS secretariat in Abuja, former president of Gambia, Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara said the ECOWAS identified problems at all stages of the election. He said: "Irregularities and the sporadic violence chara-cterised and challenged the validity of the elections." 

European Union (EU): “one of the worst elections the EU has observed”/ “elections not credible”
The European Union, who had 150 observers monitoring Nigeria's presidential and parliamentary elections, said the polls "have fallen far short of basic international and regional standards for democratic elections and... cannot be considered to have been credible." The statement said the voting held on April 14 and 21 did not represent significant progress in relation to the 2003 elections.

Elections for president and state governors were marred by violence, poor organisation, lack of transparency, widespread irregularities, significant fraud, voter disenfranchisement and bias, the observers said.

The head of the European Union monitoring team, Max van den Berg, said it was one of the worst elections that the EU had observed. ”These elections have not lived up to the hopes and expectations of the Nigerian people”. 

He said: "In 78 per cent of polling stations observed during the opening essential polling materials were missing especially polling booths and ballot papers," he said.

He accused the presidency of manipulating Independent National Electoral Commission by holding on to its power of appointing commissioners.

http://www.iri.org/newsarchive/2007/2007-04-23-News-BBCNews-Nigeria.asp  

Commonwealth Observer Group: “elections an improvement to state polls”
The Commonwealth group of 17 observers talked of significant shortcomings but said they had been an improvement on the state polls a week before. Team leader Joseph Warioba said contestants generally enjoyed freedom of assembly, movement and expression.  

http://www.iri.org/newsarchive/2007/2007-04-23-News-BBCNews-Nigeria.asp  

International Republican Institute (IRI): “the election process falls below international standards”
The US-based International Republican Institute with 59 observers said the entire electoral process had failed to meet international standards.

"Nigeria's election process, which we recognise is still continuing and thus far incomplete, falls below the standards which Nigeria itself has set in previous elections and also falls below international standards, witnessed by IRI and members of this delegation throughout the world, " said the IRI.

"Neither the spirit of Nigerians who went to the polls to cast their ballots nor the dedication of the thousands of poll workers struggling to execute their responsibilities in polling stations throughout the country were matched by their leaders."

It said it observed "underage voting, voter registration list errors, stuffed ballot boxes, group voting, party observers and police instructing individuals on who to vote for, lack of privacy for voting, lack of results sheets and other materials, falsified results sheets, and early closings".

http://www.iri.org/newsarchive/2007/2007-04-23-News-BBCNews-Nigeria.asp

National Democratic Institute (NDI): “electoral process has failed the Nigerian people and represent a step backward”
With 61 monitors deployed in 14 states, the NDI says the "electoral process has failed the Nigerian people".

“The cumulative effect of the serious problems the delegation witnessed substantially compromised the integrity of the electoral process. As a result, at this stage, it is unclear whether the April 21 elections reflect the will of the Nigerian people.

"Regrettably, the 2007 polls represent a step backward in the conduct of elections in Nigeria. "The serious flaws witnessed during this electoral process threaten to further erode citizen confidence in the country's democratic institutions."

“Those elections tested the viability of many of Nigeria’s weak public institutions, most notably the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

http://www.ndi.org/   

Human Rights Watch (HRW): “African nations largely silent on the shambles that was the election” 
As Africa's most populated and second-richest country, Nigeria is a regional powerhouse that serves as a model for the continent. African nations have been largely silent on the shambles that was the election. Indeed, President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa was the first to congratulate Yar'Adua on his victory. Others followed, including Liberia's president, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf. If Nigeria's recent democratic failure passes without consequences from the international community, then the very idea of democracy in Africa is at serious risk.
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/05/09/nigeri15887.htm 

These elections stand as only the latest example of the systemic patterns of corruption and violence that have characterised President Obasanjo’s eight-year rule. Nigerians are poorer today than they were at independence in 1960. Rising oil prices have given the government unprecedented wealth and opportunities for graft. Taking into account the antics of state and local governments, Obasanjo has presided over what is perhaps the largest theft of public resources in Africa’s post-independence history. http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/04/25/nigeri15770.htm  

www.hrw.org

African Union (AU)
 – no statement